Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Ford v. Minteq Shapes & Serv., Inc., No. 09-2140

By FindLaw Staff on November 24, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's Title VII case against his employer for racial harassment, discriminatory wage, and retaliation, district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer is affirmed where: 1) there is no genuine issues of fact with respect to the existence of racial harassment; 2) plaintiff has failed to satisfy the fourth element regarding disparate wage treatment because he adduced no evidence that higher paid workers were similarly situated; and 3) plaintiff has failed to present evidence that he suffered an adverse employment action because he engaged in an activity protected by Title VII.   

Read Ford v. Minteq Shapes & Serv., Inc., No. 09-2140

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division

Decided November 24, 2009

Judges

Before:  Bauer and Wood, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Bauer, Judge

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard