Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Fry v. Exelon Corp. Cash Balance Pension Plan, No. 08-1135

By FindLaw Staff on July 02, 2009 2:25 PM

In a dispute involving pension benefits, district court judgment is affirmed where under ERISA an age is the normal retirement age because the pension plan's text makes it so, and thus the statutory language allows employers to vary by contract aspects of pension plans and specify a normal retirement age that may differ from typical retirement patterns. 

Read Fry v. Exelon Corp. Cash Balance Pension Plan, No. 08-1135

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Argued: April 3, 2009
Decided: July 2, 2009

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and EVANS and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard