Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Gicla v. US, No. 08-1648

By FindLaw Staff on July 15, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a medical malpractice action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, district court judgment is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its decision in allowing certain expert testimony as there was no evidence that plaintiff was unduly prejudiced by an unannounced review of x-rays by the expert; and 2) the court did not err in its evaluation of witness credibility and in crediting the witness' opinions as to the propriety of the care that plaintiff received. 

Read Gicla v. US, No. 08-1648

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Argued January 13, 2009
Decided July 15, 2009

Before BAUER, POSNER, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard