Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Ho v. Donovan, No. 08-1763

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Petition for review of an order of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is denied and cross-petition for enforcement is granted where: 1) plaintiff's due process rights were not violated as the agency provided frequent notice that plaintiff chose to ignore; 2) plaintiff's claim that the monetary penalty was unauthorized because the ALJ did not consider her financial resources fails, as plaintiff walked out of the hearing and a person who fails to supply information forfeits any complaint that the decisionmaker was uninformed on some issue; and 3) plaintiff Fung's claims fail as the agency's actions were not arbitrary or capricious, and his attempt to invoke 42 U.S.C. sec. 3603(b)(1) is frivolous. 

Read Ho v. Donovan, No. 08-1763

Appellate Information
Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Argued: June 1, 2009
Decided: June 23, 2009

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard