Skip to main content

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Search by legal issue and/or location

Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)

Hukic v. Aurora Loan Serv., No. 07-3826

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In plaintiff's suit against defendants claiming breach of contract, tortious interference, and violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, arising from a six-figure mortgage he obtained at an interest rate of 10.65% where he was to make monthly payments as well as taxes, insurance premiums and other charges and fees, summary judgment in defendants' favor and dismissal of plaintiff's claims for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress is affirmed because plaintiff did not comply with the terms of his agreement that required him to submit proof of payment.   

Hukic v. Aurora Loan Serv., No. 07-3826

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Decided November 20, 2009

Judges

Before:  Bauer, Evans, and Williams, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Williams, Circuit Judge

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard