Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Judge v. Quinn, 10-2836

By FindLaw Staff on September 28, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Judge v. Quinn, 10-2836, concerned a challenge to the district court's entry of permanent injunction ordering Governor Quinn, of Illinois, to issue a writ of election that would call for a special election on November 2, 2010, and thereby effectively preventing Senator Burris from participating in the special election, in the Illinois Senator's challenge to an election procedure for filling President Barak Obama's seat in the U.S. Senate.


In affirming the order, the court held that nothing the district court did in order to bring Illinois's election procedures into line with the Seventh Amendment was beyond its capacity, and this case does not involve an issue committed to the exclusive discretion of one of the political branches.  The court also held that the Senator has forfeited the argument that the district court usurped the constitutional role of the Illinois General Assembly when it decided how candidates should be selected for the special election and set deadline for certifying election results.  Lastly, the district court's order does not run afoul of the Court's guidance on ballot-access restrictions as, nothing in the permanent injunction excludes a particular class or group of candidates in a manner that suggests than an identifiable group of voters will be left out of the special election, and the district court's order is narrowly tailored to address only one occasion, and will have no effect on future elections in Illinois.

Related Resource:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard