Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Judge's Law Review Article Does Not Warrant Recusal In Products Liability Case

By FindLaw Staff on June 07, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In In re: Sherwin-Williams, Co., No. 10-1639, the Seventh Circuit dealt with a defendant's petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that a district judge be recused from presiding over four cases against manufacturers of white lead carbonate pigments, claiming that a law review article co-written by the judge creates an appearance of bias.

As stated in the decision: "Where a judge's comments, writings, or rulings are the basis for recusal request, our analysis assumes that a reasonable person is familiar with the documents at issue, as well as the context in which they came into being."  The court went on to state: "In addition to being a  well-informed about the surrounding facts and circumstances, for purposes of our analysis, a reasonable person is a 'thoughtful observer rather than...hypersensitive or unduly suspicious person.'"

Thus, in denying the petition, the court held that the petitioner has not established that the judge's article would make a reasonable, thoughtful, and well-informed observer question his impartiality.   

Related Resource:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard