Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Majeski v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 09-1930

By FindLaw Staff on December 29, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff-employee's ERISA action against defendant-employer for denying her claim for short-term disability benefits, summary judgment in favor of the defendant is vacated and remanded as a plan administrator's procedures are not reasonable if its determination ignores, without explanation, substantial evidence that the claimant has submitted that addresses what the plan itself has defined as the ultimate issue of whether plaintiff's functional limitations were objectively documented.  

Read Majeski v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 09-1930

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Decided December 29, 2009


Before:  Wood, Evans, and Tinder, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Wood, Circuit Judge

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard