Matrisciano v. Randle, No. 06-1599

District court grant of summary judgment on plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim is affirmed where it was not clearly established at the time of plaintiff's transfer that the employer's action violated any constitutional rights and thus the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. 

Read Matrisciano v. Randle, No. 06-1599

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.
Argued November 6, 2006.
Decided June 26, 2009

Judges
Before RIPPLE, WILLIAMS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.