Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In plaintiff's suit under 42 U.S.C. section 1993 against the city of New Albany that its ordinance regulating adult establishments violates his First Amendment rights, district court's judgment is reversed and remanded where the injunction remains but should not have been issued on the ground that the ordinance is not narrowly tailored. Therefore, on remand, the court should take evidence of secondary effects caused by adult establishments that only carry books and DVDs and apply intermediate scrutiny to the ordinance.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division
Argued September 26, 2005
Decided September 10, 2009
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: