Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Omnicare, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc., 09-1152

By FindLaw Staff on January 10, 2011 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
Action for violation of the Sherman Act

Omnicare, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc., 09-1152, concerned a challenge to the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, in a pharmaceutical provider's suit against insurers, UnitedHealth Group and PacifiCare, claiming violation of the Sherman Act, as well as state antitrust claims and common law fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud and unjust enrichment claims, arising from allegations that defendants conspired to depress the reimbursement it would receive shortly after the merger.

In affirming the judgment, the court held that plaintiff cannot prove that defendants violated section 1 of the Sherman Act as the evidence in the record does not create a genuine issue of material fact as to the existence of an anticompetitive agreement among defendants.  Further, the lack of an agreement between the defendants necessarily undermines plaintiff's remaining state law claims.  Lastly, in light of dismissal of plaintiff's claims, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendants' affirmative defenses cannot proceed.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard