Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Raybourne v. Cigna Life Ins. Co. of New York, No. 08-2754

By FindLaw Staff on August 06, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a dispute involving a denial of long-term disability benefits, district court judgment is vacated and remanded where, although the court properly reviewed defendant's decision under the abuse-of-discretion standard, the case must be remanded to allow the court  to adequately account for defendant's structural conflict of interest as required by the decision in Glenn.    

Read Raybourne v. Cigna Life Ins. Co. of New York, No. 08-2754

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Argued July 8, 2009
Decided August 6, 2009

Before ROVNER, WOOD, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard