Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Rulings in Criminal Cases

By FindLaw Staff on February 24, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In US v. Hines, No. 08-3255, the Seventh Circuit faced a challenge to the district court's imposition of a 168 months' imprisonment on a defendant convicted of crack cocaine possesion and distribution.

In vacating defendant's sentence, the court concluded that the district court erred in inferring, without sufficient evidence presented by the prosecution, that defendant cooked into crack all 1.531 kilograms of powder that he bought to prove that he possessed at least 1.5 kilograms of crack to increase his guidelines sentencing range.

In US v. Napadow, No. 09-1920, the court faced a defendant's claim that his indictment for devising a scheme to defraud and obtain money from home inspectors should be dismissed because he  was denied right to a speedy trial.

Although 105 days had elapsed between defendant's first appearance before the district court and the first day of his trial, the court found that there had been no violation of the Speedy Trial Act as the pretrial motion and the ends-of-justice exclusions applied under the circumstances.



You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard