Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Talley v. US Dep't of Agric., No. 09-2123

By FindLaw Staff on February 12, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's suit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) claiming that the Department violated the Act's requirements by reporting that plaintiff is behind on a loan that has been paid off on four separate occasions, judgment in favor of plaintiff is affirmed where: 1) the Tucker Act waives sovereign immunity for compensatory-damages claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act; 2) the district court had subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. section 1331 and 15 U.S.C. section 1681p; 3) attorney's fees as part of costs do not count toward the threshold set forth in the Tucker Act, any more than the costs themselves do; and 4) appellate jurisdiction exists as plaintiff appealed to section 1331 and section 1681p and did not invoke the Tucker Act as a grant of subject matter jurisdiction.  

Read Talley v. US Dep't of Agric., No. 09-2123

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Decided February 12, 2010


Before: Easterbrook. Chief Judge, and Rovner, and Tinder, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Chief Judge  Easterbrook

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard