Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Anderson, No. 08-2925

By FindLaw Staff on September 04, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's sentence and conviction of defendant for multiple crimes related to a fraudulent telemarketing scheme is affirmed where:  1) the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support the jury's verdict that defendant acted with knowledge of a telemarketing company's fraudulent activity and with the specific intent to defraud telemarketing company's victims; 2) district court did not clearly err in applying the manager-or-supervisor enhancement as supported by evidence of defendant's involvement and control over the scheme; and 3) defendant failed to overcome the presumption that his below-guidelines sentence is reasonable.       

Read US v. Anderson, No. 08-2925

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois

Argued May 5, 2009
Decided September 3, 2009


Before Ripple and Sykes, Circuit Judges, and Lawrence, District Judge. 

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard