Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Beck, 09-2337

By FindLaw Staff on November 05, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Conviction and sentence of defendants for bank robbery related crimes affirmed

US v. Beck, 09-2337, concerned a challenge to conviction of defendants for several crimes involving a bank robbery.  In affirming, the court held that, although the district court erred by allowing a defendant's probation officer to testify that she was a probation officer and by not allowing the defense attorneys to further question a witness about his potential bias, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.  The court also held that there was no error in a defendant's sentence or the sentence imposed.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard