Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
District court's conviction of defendant for bank robbery and imposition of a 65 months' imprisonment is affirmed where: 1) Rule 12(e) applies to identification testimony in court; 2) defendant cannot supply good cause for the purpose of Rule 12(e); and 3) a motion under section 2255 is the right way to obtain review of contentions that an attorney's carelessness causes a waiver under Rule 12(e), but the record on direct appeal lacks the evidence needed to make such a decision.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
Decided February 9, 2010
Opinion by Chief Judge Easterbrook
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: