Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Daniel, No. 08-2672

By FindLaw Staff on August 13, 2009 5:05 PM

Conviction for knowingly persuading, inducing, enticing, or coercing an individual under the age of 18 to engage in criminal sexual activity is affirmed where the government's failure to disclose the identity behind two of the screen names did not violate Brady and entitle defendant to a new trial as the information was not material.    

Read US v. Daniel, No. 08-2672

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division.
Argued April 9, 2009
Decided August 13, 2009

Before MANION, ROVNER, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by WOOD, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard