Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Gallo-Moreno, No. 06-1696

By FindLaw Staff on October 19, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's conviction of defendant for drug conspiracy is affirmed where: 1) defendant's Rule 404(b) argument fails because identity was the sole issue at trial and the evidence regarding the Texas drug transaction was highly probative on that issue; 2) defendant's due process challenge to a witness' identification testimony is rejected because the identification was sufficiently reliable under the circumstances of the case; and 3) defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel was not violated as the post-indictment, uncounseled identification did not occur during a critical stage of the criminal proceedings under Wade and Ash.   

Read US v. Gallo-Moreno, No. 06-1696

Appellate Information

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Argued November 3, 2009
Decided October 19, 2009


Before:  Kanne, Evans, and Sykes, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Sykes, Circuit Judge

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard