Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Conviction of defendant for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting co-conspirator's hearsay statements; 2) district court did not err in admitting evidence seized during a traffic stop of the vehicle in which the defendant was riding based on probable cause; and 3) defendant's sufficiency of evidence challenge is without merit, as evidence presented by the government would enable a rational jury to find defendant guilty of the possession charge on which he seeks a judgment of acquittal.
Read US v. Harris, No. 08-4026
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Decided October 30, 2009
Judges
Before: Flaum, Williams and Evans, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Flaum, Circuit Judge
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: