Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Hurt, No. 08-2986

By FindLaw Staff on July 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Conviction and sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where: 1) the issue of the testimony of officers as both fact and expert witnesses was waived as there was no objection to the officers testifying in both capacities during trial; 2) any error in the government's failure to  disclose the names of the testifying experts was harmless as defendant knew the names of the expert officers and the subject of their intended testimony before they testified; and 3) the court did not err in sentencing defendant to the lowest end of the career offender Guidelines range as it began with the Guidelines as its benchmark and did not deviate from them after it balanced the 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553(a) factors.    

Read US v. Hurt, No. 08-2986

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
Argued April 2, 2009
Decided: July 28, 2009

Before BAUER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges, and KAPALA, District Judge.
Opinion by BAUER, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard