Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Isaacs, No. 08-2876

By FindLaw Staff on January 25, 2010 2:41 PM

District court's conviction of defendant, a wireless telephone store owner, of fraudulently using unauthorized access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1029(a)(2) is affirmed where: 1) district court acted within its discretion in denying defendant's motion to continue the trial for thirty days as he has failed to show that there were any material differences in the underlying data contained in the new set of CDs he received shortly before trial, so as to cause him any prejudice; 2) because the government complied with Rule 1006, the district court properly admitted the summary exhibits into evidence; 3) district court did not abuse its discretion in limiting defendant's cross-examination of witness; and 4) defendant's argument that he has presented three clear errors made by the district court constituting cumulative errors is without merit. 

Read US v. Isaacs, No. 08-2876

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Decided January 25, 2010


Before: Kanne, and Sykes, Circuit Judges, and Van Bokkelen, District Judge

Opinion by District Judge Van Bokkelen

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard