Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Maulding, 09-3103

By FindLaw Staff on November 30, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's imposition of a below-range sentence in a conviction of defendant for child pornography related crimes affirmed

US v. Maulding, 09-3103, concerned a challenge to the district court's imposition of a below-Guidelines range 240-month sentence followed by a life term of supervised release upon a defendant convicted of receipt, possession, and distribution of child pornography.

In affirming, the court held that defendant's argument, that 240 months is necessarily unreasonable because the Chapter 2 guidelines on which it is based is flawed, has already been rejected.  Here, the district court correctly calculated the guidelines range, acknowledged that the guidelines are advisory, agreed with defendant that several mitigating factors favored him, and then imposed a below-range sentence which the court deemed warranted in light of the section 3553(a) factors.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard