Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Monroe, No. 08-2945

By FindLaw Staff on September 01, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's sentence of a defendant convicted of drug possession with intent to distribute is affirmed where, although under the terms of the plea agreement defendant did not waive his right to seek a reduction in the length of the sentence under 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2), defendant was ineligible to seek a sentence reduction because the "starting point" for defendant's sentence was the statutory, mandatory minimum sentence. Such minimum sentence was not reduced or otherwise affected by Amendment 706, which impacted only his base offense level, not his sentencing range. 

Read US v. Monroe, No. 08-2945

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division.
Argued January 15, 2009
Decided September 1, 2009


Before Ripple, Manion, and Evans, Circuit Judges 
Opinion by Ripple, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard