Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US v. Oros, No. 08-2511

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Conviction and sentencing of a defendant for bribery is affirmed where: 1) district court's error in allowing the government to present summary charts to the jury was harmless error in that it did not have a substantial and injurious effect on the jury's verdict; 2) the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to find defendant guilty of bribery beyond a reasonable doubt; and 3) district court did not commit clear  error in calculating the amount of loss in determining defendant's offense level.       

Read US v. Oros, No. 08-2511

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Argued April 8, 2009
Decided August 25, 2009

Judges

Before Easterbrook, Chief Judge, and  Kanne, and WIlliams, Circuit Judges 
Opinion by Williams, Circuit Judge.

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard