Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Orozco, No. 06-4235

By FindLaw Staff on August 13, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Conviction and sentence for drug crimes and firearms possession is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly denied defendant's suppression motion as the affidavit was sufficient to establish probable cause to search defendant's home, and even were it not, the officer acted in good faith when he executed the search of defendant's home in reliance on the warrant; 2) the court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence relating to defendant's prior firearm conviction as the evidence relating to the conviction was admissible under Fed. R. Evidence 404(b); and 3) district court properly applied the U.S.S.G. sec. 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement for possession of a gun in connection with a drug offense.    

Read US v. Orozco, No. 06-4235

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Argued September 3, 2008
Decided August 13, 2009

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and ROVNER and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by SYKES, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard