Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Risner, No. 09-2627

By FindLaw Staff on February 03, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a conviction of defendant for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of an unregistered firearm, district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress is affirmed as, district court did not err in finding that defendant's then-girlfriend impliedly consented to the police entries into the home shared with the defendant.   

Read US v. Risner, No.  09-2627

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division

Decided February 3, 2010


Before: Bauer, Kanne, and Tinder, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge  Kanne

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard