Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Simmons, No. 08-2207

By FindLaw Staff on September 11, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Sentence and conviction of defendant for conspiracy, armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during a crime of violence is affirmed where:  1) for purposes of a bank robbery count, sufficient evidence existed for a jury to find that bank teller's life was in jeopardy when co-conspirator pointed an unloaded gun at the teller; 2) as to the firearm count, it was foreseeable to the defendant that the robbery would have involved the use of a firearm; 3) district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's request for a mistrial after the government displayed a demonstrative chart with defendant's mug shot in its closing argument, as the brief glimpse of the photograph did not deprive defendant of a fair trial; 4) district court did not abuse its discretion in failing sua sponte to order a mistrial, as prosecution's statement in its closing argument was not improper vouching of co-conspirators; and 5) application of an enhancement based on abduction was proper as there was sufficient evidence to support that abduction took place and was foreseeable.     

Read US v. Simmons, No. 08-2207

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Argued February 25, 2009
Decided September 11, 2009


Before Flaum, Williams, and Tinder, Circuit Judges 

Opinion by Tinder, Circuit Judge

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard