Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Taylor, 10-1304

By FindLaw Staff on December 21, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
Sentencing issue in defendant's conviction for bank robbery and parole violation

US v. Taylor, 10-1304, concerned a challenge to a conviction of defendant for bank robbery and for violating the terms of his supervised release relating to an earlier bank robbery conviction.  The court ordered a remand for a limited purpose as the district court erred by treating the policy statement recommendation in U.S.S.G. section 7B1.3(f) as mandating consecutive sentencing for defendant's bank robbery case and his supervised release case, rather than appreciating its discretion to impose the sentences either consecutively or concurrently.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard