Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Woods, No. 08-1778

By FindLaw Staff on September 09, 2009 5:56 PM

In a consolidated appeal of a denial of three defendants' motions to modify their sentences pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2), denial of the motions is affirmed where: 1) defendants did not give up their right to appeal the denial of the motions as section 3582(c)(2) motions do not fall within the appeal waiver's scope; and 2) the district court did not err in finding the defendants ineligible for a reduction where the court did not make findings inconsistent with those of the original sentencing court and it did not abuse its discretion in light of the large quantity of drugs involved and in finding that the defendants were responsible for more than 4.5 kg of crack each. 

Read US v. Woods, No. 08-1778

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division
Argued December 4, 2008
Decided September 9, 2009


Before Bauer, Posner, and Williams, Circuit Judges 

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard