Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Valentino v. Village of South Chicago Heights, No. 06-3882

By FindLaw Staff on July 30, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action for First Amendment retaliation and retaliatory discharge, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where: 1) plaintiff established a prima facie case for retaliation and presented sufficient evidence from which a jury could infer that defendants' stated reason for terminating her employment was pretextual; 2) plaintiff's Monell claim may proceed to trial as plaintiff has shown that the mayor was the final policymaker for defendant, such that defendant may be held liable if the jury finds that the mayor and village administrator retaliated against her in violation of her First Amendment rights; and 3) defendant is not entitled to immunity under the the Illinois Tort Immunity Act from plaintiff's retaliatory discharge claim as the decision to fire her did not amount to a policy decision as defined by the Illinois courts. 

Read Valentino v. Village of South Chicago Heights, No. 06-3882

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Argued: May 12, 2008
Decided: July 30, 2009

Before ROVNER, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard