Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Denial of Motion to Suppress Reversed for Lack of Apparent Authority to Consent

By FindLaw Staff on April 13, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In US v. Taylor, No. 09-3019, the court faced a challenge to the district court's grant of defendant's motion to suppress evidence in his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition.  At issue was whether a femal tenant of the apartment, where defendant was found pursuant to a state warrant for his arrest, had apparent authority to consent to the search of a shoebox.

In concluding that there was ambiguity over whether the tenant had mutual use or control of the shoebox and that the officers failed to cure this ambiguity by asking either the tenant or defendant to clarify the situation, the court reversed the district court's denial of motion to suppress as the tenant lacked the apparent authority to consent to the search of the shoebox. 

Related Resource:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard