Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Gillis, No. 07-3754

By FindLaw Staff on January 19, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's imposition of a sentence of 262 months' imprisonment followed by six years of supervised release on a defendant convicted of possession and sale of crack cocaine within 1000 feet of a public school is affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded where: 1) the government has not met its burden of showing that an error by the district court was harmless because it cannot be concluded that the court would have imposed the same sentence had it known that the career offender Guidelines were advisory; and 2) a denial of defendant's motion for a reduced sentence is affirmed as his career offender status disqualified him from receiving a reduced sentence under Guidelines Amendment 706 for crack cocaine offenses under Guideline 2D1.1. 

Read US v. Gillis, No. 07-3754

Appellate Information

Argued: October 15, 2009

Decided and Filed: January 15, 2010


Opinion by Circuit Judge Martin


For Appellant:  Gary W. Crim, Law Office

For Appellee:  Edward F. Ferran, Assistant United States Attorney

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard