Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
What inspires the formation of a non-profit? Often, it is the desire to address a cause, support specific reform, and make a statement. Well, non-profits who choose to make themselves heard by funding state and local candidates received a nod from the U.S. Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia this week.
The case was brought by Emily's List, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that backs female Democratic candidates who support abortion. The D.C. court held that Federal Election Commission (F.E.C.) rules restricting the amount of "soft money" contributions-- unlimited donations by companies, individuals, unions, and political action groups to non-profits-- used to fund candidates violated the First Amendment.
The regulation under scrutiny was passed in 2005 required non-profit organizations such as Emily's List to spend "hard money" rather than soft money to fund election-related activities. Hard money refers to the donations raised that were subject to limitations. For example, money raised according to the regulation capping contributions made by individuals to $5,000 would be considered hard money.
The case could reach the halls of the U.S. Supreme Court for final consideration and decision. For now, though, Emily's List-- and other non-profits that back candidates-- are relieved to have the law back on their side.
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: