Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

AE, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., No. 07-1526

By FindLaw Staff on August 12, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a product liability action, a denial of prejudgment interest to plaintiff is affirmed where the district court employed an improper presumption that plaintiff was not entitled to prejudgment interest simply because its damages estimates were inconsistent, but plaintiff's damages were not sufficiently calculable to serve as a basis for prejudgment interest under Utah law.

Read AE, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., No. 07-1526

Appellate Information

Filed August 11, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Lucero

Counsel

For Appellant:

Stephen G. Masciocchi, Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, CO

David L. Black, Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, CO

For Appellee:

Roger P. Thomasch, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Denver, CO

Mary A. Wells, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Denver, CO

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard