Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Mendiola v. Holder, No. 08-9565

By FindLaw Staff on October 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a petition for review of the BIA's denial of petitioner's second motion to reopen his removal proceedings, the petition is denied where the BIA correctly determined that 8 C.F.R. section 1003.2(d)'s post-departure bar divested it of jurisdiction to review a motion to reopen filed by a removed alien, like petitioner, even though relevant regulations allowed an alien to file one motion to reopen within 90 days.

Read Mendiola v. Holder, No. 08-9565

Appellate Information

Filed October 28, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Baldock

Counsel

For Petitioner:

Kari E. Hong, Portland, OR

For Respondent:

R. Alexander Goring, Michelle Gorden Latour, Office of Immigration Litigation, (Michelle Gorden Latour, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard