Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Alzainati v. Holder, No. 07-9565

By FindLaw Staff on June 17, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Petitioner's petition for review of the BIA's order denying his petition to reopen is denied where: 1) the record reflected that the BIA fully considered the evidence submitted by Petitioner; and 2) Petitioner's challenges to the BIA's factual assumptions could not be recast as constitutional claims falling under the jurisdictional safe-harbor of 8 U.S.C. section 1252(a)(2)(D).

Read the full decision in Alzainati v. Holder, No. 07-9565.

Appellate Information:

APPEAL FROM THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS PETITION FOR REVIEW
Filed on June 17, 2009

Judges:

Before O'BRIEN, Circuit Judge, BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

Opinion by O'BRIEN, Circuit Judge.

Counsel:

Submitted on the briefs. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal.

Daniel F. Boyle, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner.

Mark C. Walters, Assistant Director, Joanne E. Johnson, Attorney, Department of
Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation
, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard