Skip to main content

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Search by legal issue and/or location

Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)

U.S. Tenth Circuit

Filter by Category

Federal Courts Petition for Review of EPA's "Indian Land" Determination, and Criminal Matters

Petition for Review of EPA's "Indian Land" Determination, and Criminal Matters

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Hydro Resources, Inc. v. EPA, No. 07-9506, involved a petition for review of the EPA's "final land status determination" expressing its judgment that...

Federal Courts Cocaine Possession Conviction Affirmed, and Other Criminal Matter

Cocaine Possession Conviction Affirmed, and Other Criminal Matter

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

In US v. Corrales, No.

Federal Courts Positions Filled by Temporary Workers Not "Vacant" Within Meaning of the ADA

Positions Filled by Temporary Workers Not "Vacant" Within Meaning of the ADA

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Duvall v. Georgia-Pac. Consumer Prods., L.P., No. 08-7096, concerned an action under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for failure to grant plaintiff a...

Federal Courts Constitutional Challenge to Kansas Code of Judicial Conduct Prohibiting Publicly Endorsing Candidate, and Civil Rights Matter

Constitutional Challenge to Kansas Code of Judicial Conduct Prohibiting Publicly Endorsing Candidate, and Civil Rights Matter

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Yost v. Stout, No. 09-3099, involved a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 challenge to the "endorsement clause" of the Kansas Code of Judicial Conduct that generally...

Federal Courts Denial of Capital Habeas Petition, and Indian Law Matter

Denial of Capital Habeas Petition, and Indian Law Matter

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

In Welch v. Workman, No.

Federal Courts Action Claiming that BATF Agent Used Excessive Force, and Criminal Matter

Action Claiming that BATF Agent Used Excessive Force, and Criminal Matter

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Thomas v. Durastanti, 07-3343, involved an action claiming that a BATF agent violated plaintiff's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures...

Copied to clipboard