Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Feesers, Inc. v. Michael Foods, Inc., No. 09-2548

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

In a suit for unlawful price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act (RPA) against a food manufacturer and a food service management company, judgment in favor of plaintiff-food distributor is vacated with instruction for the district court to enter judgment as a matter of law for defendants as plaintiff cannot satisfy the competitive injury requirement of a prima facie case of price discrimination under section 2(a) of the RPA because the plaintiff and defendant were not competitors, and therefore, plaintiff cannot show it suffered competitive injury under RPA. 

Read Feesers, Inc. v. Michael Foods, Inc., No. 09-2548

Appellate Information

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

Opinion Filed January 7, 2010


Before: Smith, Nygaard, and Fisher, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Smith


For Appellant:  Jeffrey L. Kessler, Dewey & LeBoeuf

For Appellee:   Robert T. Englert, Glen D. Nager

Was this helpful?

Response sent, thank you

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard