Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Giles v. Kearney, No. 07-4140

By FindLaw Staff on July 15, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a prisoner civil rights action alleging excessive force and deliberate indifference to medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment, summary judgment for defendants is reversed in part and affirmed in part where: 1) as to three correctional officers in their individual capacities, plaintiff alleged conduct in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights that a reasonable officer would have known was a violation under the circumstances, and thus it was improper to dismiss plaintiff's complaints against the officers on the basis of qualified immunity; 2) the court did not err in finding that the use of force in a shower incident and by other officers in the infirmary cell incident was not excessive, as the record reflects that the court considered the Whitley factors and the findings made by the court were sufficient for a clear understanding of the basis of the decision; and 3) the court did not clearly err in holding that there was no deliberate indifference to plaintiff's serious medical needs.   

Read Giles v. Kearney, No. 07-4140

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
Argued March 10, 2009
Decided July 15, 2009

Before: FUENTES, CHAGARES and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

For Appellant: Kathryn J. Gainey, Steptoe & Johnson LLP.

For Appellee: Judy Oken Hodas, Deputy Attorney General.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard