2nd Judge Rules Against Male-Only Draft
Equal ProtectionIn Kyle-Labell v. Selective Service System, Judge Esther Salas ruled that Elizabeth Kyle-Labell may proceed with her lawsuit. The plaintiff alleges the draft deprives women of equal protection of the law. The government contended that only Congress can decide the issue and that the Supreme Court already said the draft was constitutional in 1981. The judge basically said that was then, but this is now. The difference, she said, is that Congress and the Pentagon have removed gender-based restrictions for women serving in combat. The Trump administration, however, has said it would "disrupt or distract" military operations. USA Today reported that the ruling "increases the likelihood that the issue could get to the Supreme Court" because of the earlier decision in Texas.
"Time Has Passed"In that case, Judge Gray Milleer said the "time has passed" for a debate on whether women belong in the military. He said historical restrictions on women in the military "may have justified past discrimination," but times have changed. The case had been working through the trial court for six years. The decision, issued about two weeks ago, was a declaratory judgment and largely symbolic. It laid the groundwork for the New Jersey case, however, where the plaintiff is seeking injunctive relief to change the draft. Related Resources:
United States Third Circuit Cases (FindLaw's Cases & Codes)
Debt Buyers Are Subject to Debt Collection Law (FindLaw's U.S. Third Circuit Blog)
Government Can't Withhold Grants From Sanctuary City (FindLaw's U.S. Third Circuit Blog)
Was this helpful?
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Or contact an attorney near you: