Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. 5 Unlabeled Boxes, No. 07-4352

By FindLaw Staff on July 14, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court grant of summary judgment upholding the FDA's Final Rule banning all supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids is affirmed where res judicata bars third party plaintiff Hi-Tech's arguments on appeal as Hi-Tech had two full opportunities to litigate its challenge to the Final Rule banning EDS in district court, and the Eleventh Circuit evaluated Hi-Tech's claims and determined them to be without merit.    

Read US v. 5 Unlabeled Boxes, No. 07-4352

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
Filed: July 14, 2009

Before: RENDELL, SMITH, Circuit Judges, and POLLAK, District Judge
Opinion by CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

For Appellant: Kathryn L. Clark, Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott; Joseph P. Schilleci, Jr., Timothy M. Fulmer, Natter & Fulmer, P.C.; Edmund J. Novotny, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell, & Berkowitz, P.C.

For Appellee: Christine N. Kohl, Douglas N. Letter, United States Department of Justice.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard