Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Thomas v. Mundell, No. 07-15388

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In an action by county attorneys challenging certain post-sentencing probation programs adopted and supervised by the superior court, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the programs because their alleged injury was insufficiently concrete.

Read Thomas v. Mundell, No. 07-15388

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 23, 2008

Filed July 15, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Wallace

Counsel

For Appellants:

Michael A. Carvin, Jones Day, Washington, DC

For Appellees:

Scot L. Claus, Mariscal, Weeks, McIntyre & Friedlander, P.A., Phoenix, AZ

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard