Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Suppression of Evidence in Federal Narcotics and Weapons Case Reversed

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In US v. Stearn, No. 08-3230, the court faced a challenge to the district court's order granting in part motions to suppress evidence following a grand jury's indictment of defendants for federal narcotic and weapons offenses.

In reversing the district court's judgment in its entirety, the court held that the magistrate judge had a substantial basis for determining that probable cause existed to search a home that was apparently the residence of a confirmed drug dealer. 

Although closer probable cause questions were presented by searches of other residences, each search was upheld under the Leon good faith exception. 

Finally, suppression of a defendant's saliva sample as "fruits of the poisonous tree" is reversed as he failed to prove a primary invasion of his own Fourth Amendment rights.

Related Resource:

 

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard