Becerril v. Pima County Assessor's Office, No. 08-17070
In an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) action claiming that a county office discriminated against plaintiff-employee by reassigning her because of her disability and refusing to engage in the ADA's "interactive process" after she had requested a reasonable accommodation, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) there was no evidence that plaintiff's supervisor reassigned her because her coworkers in the public service section complained about accommodations she received for her disability; and 2) plaintiff did not raise a triable issue on whether her disability substantially limited her in speaking, eating, seeing, sleeping, and thinking and concentrating.
Read Becerril v. Pima County Assessor's Office, No. 08-17070
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted November 3, 2009
Filed November 25, 2009
Judges
Per Curiam
Counsel
For Appellant:
Richard M. Martinez, Law Office of Richard M. Martinez, Tucson, AZ
For Appellee:
Stacey Roseberry, Pima County Attorney's Office, Tucson, AZ