Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Class Action Status Approved for Claims Against Facebook's Facial Recognition Technology

Male using latest smartphone technology for a biometric facial recognition unlock. Filmed with dark background with facial wire mesh and points tracking viewers face to unlock phone. Concept theme
By Laura Temme, Esq. | Last updated on

The 9th Circuit recently affirmed class certification for claims alleging Facebook’s facial recognition technology violates Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act.

Facebook users in the suit allege that the social media platform’s “Tag Suggestions” feature illegally collected biometric data. The feature used previously uploaded photos to recognize a user’s Facebook friends for easier tagging. Specifically, Facebook developed a “face template” using facial recognition technology that could identify someone’s facial features to a surprisingly accurate degree.

Face-Mapping Raises Privacy Concerns for Facebook Users

The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act protects individuals’ ability to control how their biometric data is used. Any private entity in possession of biometric information, or “biometric identifiers” must have a written policy that is available to the public and a process for obtaining consent before utilizing someone’s biometric info.

In the context of the statute, “biometric identifiers” are:

  • Retina or iris scans
  • Fingerprints
  • Voice prints
  • Scans of hand or face geometry

The last point is where Facebook has gotten itself in trouble. When Facebook users enabled Tag Suggestions, the facial recognition technology extracted unique geometric data points about someone’s face, such as the distance between their eyes, to create a face signature.

Privacy Invasion Constitutes Concrete Injury

One of the reasons the Illinois legislature felt the need for stricter rules on biometric data is the fact that it cannot be changed in the event it is compromised – leaving victims of identity theft with no recourse. It seems the 9th Circuit agrees, finding a violation of the Illinois statute injures someone’s “concrete right to privacy” and allowing plaintiffs to move forward as a class action.

Counsel for the plaintiffs estimated around 7 million people might be eligible to join the class.

Related Resources:

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard