Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Doe v. Abbott Labs., No. 08-17699

By FindLaw Staff on July 07, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an antitrust action alleging monopoly leveraging in an HIV drug market, the denial of summary judgment to Defendants is reversed, where allegations of monopoly leveraging through pricing conduct in two markets does not state a claim under Section 2 of the Sherman Act absent an antitrust refusal to deal in the monopoly market or below-cost pricing in the second market.

Read Doe v. Abbott Labs., No. 08-17699

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted May 13, 2009

Filed July 7, 2009


Opinion by Judge Rymer


For Appellant:

James F. Hurst, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL

Jeffrey I. Weinberger, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA

For Appellees:

Richard R. Wiebe, Law Office of Richard R. Wiebe, San Francisco, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard