Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 08-55706

By FindLaw Staff on July 10, 2009 4:31 PM

In a breach of contract action by employees of foreign suppliers to a U.S. retailer based on a code of conduct included in Defendant's supply contracts specifying labor standards suppliers must meet, the dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where the code of conduct did not create a duty on the part of Defendant to monitor the suppliers, and did not provide Plaintiffs a right of action against Defendant as third-party beneficiaries.

Read Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 08-55706

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted May 8, 2009

Filed July 10, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Gould

Counsel

For Appellants:

Terrence P. Collingsworth, Conrad & Scherer, Washington, DC

Dan Stormer, Hadsell & Stormer, Pasadena, CA

For Appellee:

James N. Penrod, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, San Francisco, CA

Thomas M. Peterson, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, San Francisco, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard