Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Friedman v. Boucher, No. 05-15675

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging the unlawful taking of a DNA sample, the dismissal of the action on qualified immunity grounds is reversed, where the forcible taking of the DNA sample under these circumstances violated Plaintiff's clearly established Fourth Amendment rights.

Read Friedman v. Boucher, No. 05-15675

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 19, 2007

Filed June 23, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Thomas

Dissent by Judge Callahan

Counsel

For Appellant:

Tyler A. Baker, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA

Saundra Riley, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA

Kimberly I. Culp, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA

Julie A. Nokleberg, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA

For Appellees:

Robert J. Gower, Deputy District Attorney, Las Vegas, NV

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard