Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., No. 07-35487
In an action against an online marketer for sending unsolicited e-mail (i.e. spam), summary judgment for defendants-spammers is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff was not an "Internet access service" provider within the meaning of the CAN-SPAM Act; and 2) plaintiff was not "adversely affected by" spam e-mail solely by virtue of receiving a large amount of commercial e-mail.
Read Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., No. 07-35487
Argued and Submitted December 9, 2008
Filed August 6, 2009
Opinion by Judge Tallman
Timothy J. Walton, Walton & Rose, LLP, Palo Alto, CA
Derek Newman, Newman & Newman, Attorneys at Law, LLP, Seattle, WA
Randall Moeller, Newman & Newman, Attorneys at Law, LLP, Seattle, WA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.